On 2019-03-18 18:42:34 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Per the confirmation guidelines[0] and foundation mailing list > thread[1], the OSF Board of directors is soliciting feedback from > representatives of existing confirmed Open Infrastructure Projects > (so far that's just OpenStack) when evaluating the Kata Containers > and Zuul pilot projects' upcoming applications for OIP confirmation. > Particularly worth calling out, guideline #4 "Open collaboration" > asserts the following: > > Project behaves as a good neighbor to other confirmed and pilot > projects. > > If you (our community at large, not just TC members) have any > observations/interactions with the Kata Containers and Zuul > maintainers or their software which could serve as useful examples > for how these projects do or do not meet this and other guidelines, > please provide them in the per-project pads[2][3] and if possible > include a citation with links to substantiate your feedback. After > March 31, 2019 the information there will be assembled into more > cohesive documents and posted to the foundation mailing list in > preparation for the scheduled OSF Board of Directors meeting[4] on > April 8. > > [0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/OSFProjectConfirmationGuidelines > [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2019-March/002721.html > [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-tc-kata-confirmation-feedback > [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-tc-zuul-confirmation-feedback > [4] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2019-March/002733.html Please forgive the netiquette transgression of my self-reply, but I wanted to add the [all] tag for increased visibility. We haven't collected a vast amount of feedback from the OpenStack community on the Kata Containers and Zuul pilot projects yet, so please see the above. If you or your project has interactions with the teams and software for these and wants to provide details on how you think they do or don't meet the board's guidelines for OIP confirmation, please add information to the etherpads linked above some time this week. Thanks in advance! -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190326/0cdc4616/attachment-0001.sig>