[neutron] [nova] CI issue

Sean Mooney smooney at redhat.com
Mon Jun 24 20:23:56 UTC 2019


Top posting to let everyone know
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/667035/ has merged and it is now
safe to recheck your neutron changes.

On Mon, 2019-06-24 at 15:37 +0100, Sean Mooney wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-24 at 14:32 +0200, Slawomir Kaplonski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > On 24 Jun 2019, at 13:22, Sean Mooney <smooney at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2019-06-24 at 10:01 +0200, Slawomir Kaplonski wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > It looks for me that it is caused by change in Nova [1]
> > > > 
> > > > I proposed revert of this patch [2] and DNM patch in neutron to check if that will really help: [3]
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/644881/
> > > > [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/667035/
> > > > [3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/667036/
> > > 
> > > i am pretty sure i know the reason that this is failing.
> > > path 1 does not have special case handeling for same host resize where
> > > we do not receive events form neutron at all. that patch was previously tested with only
> > > a multinode setup where without that patch we race and normally fail to start waiting for vif-plugged
> > > events form neutorn before we recive them cause the revert to fail.
> > > we could do a revert but i would prefer to instead add a follow up patch to adress the same host case.
> > 
> > If You can propose proper fix soon, this would be the best solution :)
> > If it will take some time for You we should either merge revert for now or send patch to skip those 3 tests in
> > neutron
> > jobs to unblock our gates.
> > Please tell me which solution I should go with then.
> 
> just a quick update.
> we have decided to merge the revert. it will take a while for the revert to merge
> so please hold of on recheck neutron patches until it has merged.
> we will update the list when that happens
> 
> once we have updated and tested the patch for the same host resize revert edgecase
> we will resubmit it. ill pull in the neturon job with a DNM patch to validate it.
> sorry for the breakage.
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > > On 24 Jun 2019, at 09:29, Slawomir Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi neutrinos,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since about 2 days we have some problem with iptables_hybrid jobs in Neutron CI. See [1] for details.
> > > > > I’m now trying to find out what can be the problem there but if I will not find it anything soon I will
> > > > > propose
> > > > > temporary patch to skip those 3 failing tests for now.
> > > > > Please don’t recheck Your patches if it failed on those 2 jobs - this will fail again :/
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1833902
> > > > > — 
> > > > > Slawek Kaplonski
> > > > > Senior software engineer
> > > > > Red Hat
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > — 
> > > > Slawek Kaplonski
> > > > Senior software engineer
> > > > Red Hat
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > — 
> > Slawek Kaplonski
> > Senior software engineer
> > Red Hat
> > 
> 
> 




More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list