Open Stack

On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 09:17 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 19-06-06 09:13:46, Michał Dulko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 11:58 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > On 19-05-30 10:17:39, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > > On 19-05-30 17:07:54, Michał Dulko wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 15:53 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > > > > Openshift upstream is giving us difficulty as they are capping the
> > > > > > version of urllib3 and kubernetes we are using.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > -urllib3===1.25.3
> > > > > > +urllib3===1.24.3
> > > > > > -kubernetes===9.0.0
> > > > > > +kubernetes===8.0.1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I've opened an issue with them but not had much luck there (and their
> > > > > > prefered solution just pushes the can down the road).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > https://github.com/openshift/openshift-restclient-python/issues/289
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > What I'd us to do is move off of openshift as our usage doesn't seem too
> > > > > > much.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > openstack/kuryr-tempest-plugin uses it for one import (and just one
> > > > > > function with that import).  I'm not sure exactly what you are doing
> > > > > > with it but would it be too much to ask to move to something else?
> > > > > 
> > > > > From Kuryr side it's not really much effort, we can switch to bare REST
> > > > > calls, but obviously we prefer the client. If there's much support for
> > > > > getting rid of it, we can do the switch.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Right now Kyryr is only using it in that one place and it's blocking the
> > > > update of urllib3 and kubernetes for the rest of openstack.  So if it's
> > > > not too much trouble it'd be nice to have happen.
> > > > 
> > > > > > x/flame has it in it's constraints but I don't see any actual usage, so
> > > > > > perhaps it's a false flag.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Please let me know what you think
> > > > > > 
> > > 
> > > Any updates on this?  I'd like to move forward on removing the
> > > dependency if possible.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sure, I'm waiting for some spare time to do this. Fastest it may happen
> > will probably be next week.
> > 
> 
> Sounds good, thanks for working on it.
> 

The patch [1] is up, let's see if my alternative approach haven't broke
our gates. I'll ping you once it's merged so you can propose a patch
removing openshift library from global-requirements.

[1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665352