Open Stack

Hi Eric,

Thank you for following up and the notes.

The spec[4] is related but a complex one too with all the migration implementation. So I will try to put a new spec with a limited implementation of resize.

Regards,
Madhuri

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Eric Fried [mailto:openstack at fried.cc]
>>Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2019 11:15 PM
>>To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
>>Subject: Re: [Nova][Ironic] Reset Configurations in Baremetals Post
>>Provisioning
>>
>>We discussed this today in the nova meeting [1] with a little bit of followup
>>in the main channel after the meeting closed [2].
>>
>>There seems to be general support (or at least not objection) for
>>implementing "resize" for ironic, limited to:
>>
>>- same host [3]
>>- just this feature (i.e. "hyperthreading") or possibly "anything deploy
>>template"
>>
>>And the consensus was that it's time to put this into a spec.
>>
>>There was a rocky spec [4] that has some overlap and could be repurposed;
>>or a new one could be introduced.
>>
>>efried
>>
>>[1]
>>http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2019/nova.2019-06-13-
>>14.00.log.html#l-309
>>[2]
>>http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-
>>nova.2019-06-13.log.html#t2019-06-13T15:02:10
>>(interleaved)
>>[3] an acknowledged wrinkle here was that we need to be able to detect at
>>the API level that we're dealing with an Ironic instance, and ignore the
>>allow_resize_to_same_host option (because always forcing same host) [4]
>>https://review.opendev.org/#/c/449155/