Open Stack

 ---- On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:26:39 +0900 Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote ----
 > Ghanshyam Mann wrote: 
 > >  ---- On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 03:37:05 +0900 Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com> wrote ---- 
 > >  > If the project isn’t creating stable branches each cycle, how is it cycle-based? What’s wrong with moving it to use the independent release model, which was created for cases like this? 
 > >  
 > > Tempest and all Tempest plugins are "cycle-with-intermediary" because we want a particular release tag per OpenStack release. That is what we decided in ML discussion while deciding the release model for tempest plugins [1]. With independent release mode, we face the issue of not having the compatible versions of all Tempest plugins which user need to run on against their production cloud.  
 > >  
 > > [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-June/131837.html 
 >  
 > Yes, it's a weird corner case that we regularly rediscuss when we 
 > (re)discover it does not fit well in our traditional 
 > cycle-with-intermediary box. 
 >  
 > I feel like having an extra stable-branch-type will help us remember 
 > what to do with those and avoid mistakes. 

Yeah, I agree with that. Once your patch of stable-branch-type is merged, I can add
this type as none for tempest and its plugins.

-gmann

 >  
 > --  
 > Thierry Carrez (ttx) 
 >  
 >