[uc][tc][ops] reviving osops- repos

Andreas Jaeger aj at suse.com
Tue Jul 2 11:06:09 UTC 2019

On 11/06/2019 13.55,  Jean-Philippe Evrard  wrote:
>> Alternatively, I feel like a SIG (be it the Ops Docs SIG or a new 
>> "Operational tooling" SIG) would totally be a good idea to revive this. 
>> In that case we'd define the repository in [4].
>> My personal preference would be for a new SIG, but whoever is signing up 
>> to work on this should definitely have the final say.
> Agreed on having it inside OpenStack namespace, and code handled by a team/SIG/WG (with my preference being a SIG -- existing or not). When this team/SIG/WG retires, the repo would with it. It provides clean ownership, and clear cleanup when disbanding.

Mohammed, is that consensus and actionable?

Could you then update https://review.opendev.org/#/c/662300/ to reflect
this, please?

 Andreas Jaeger aj at suse.com Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D 90409 Nürnberg
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list