Open Stack

Greetings,

If your CI can vote on ci-sandbox, you should be able to vote on ironic. I
don't remember having to grand permissions previously. If not, please let
me know and I'll contact the Infrastructure team.

-Julia

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:50 PM xmufive at qq.com <sokoban at foxmail.com> wrote:

> Hi julia，
>
> It seems the basic features of our 3rd party CI is ready. It now could
> verify +1 on openstack-dev/ci-sandbox[1].
> I am writing for asking for permission of review ironic project for
> huawei-ironic-ci.
>
> The account used for huawei-ironic-ci is:
>
> Username
>       huawei-ironic-ci
> Full Name Huawei Ironic CI
> Email Address zhengxianhui at huawei.com
> Registered Jan 14, 2019 8:00 PM
> Account ID 29800
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/630893/
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> *发件人:* "Julia Kreger"<juliaashleykreger at gmail.com>;
> *发送时间:* 2019年1月9日(星期三) 晚上10:47
> *收件人:* "xmufive at qq.com"<sokoban at foxmail.com>;
> *抄送:* "openstack-discuss"<openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>;
> *主题:* Re: Ironic ibmc driver for Huawei server
>
> Ironic does not have a deadline for merging specs. We will generally
> avoid landing large features the closer we get to the end of the
> cycle. If third party CI is up before the end of the cycle, I suspect
> it would just be a matter of iterating the driver code through review.
> You may wish to propose it sooner rather than later, and we can begin
> to give you feedback from there.
>
> -Julia
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:21 PM xmufive at qq.com <sokoban at foxmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Julia，
> >
> > When is the deadline of approving specs, I am afraid that huawei ibmc
> spec will be  put off util next release.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Qianbiao NG
> >
> >
> > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> > 发件人: "Julia Kreger"<juliaashleykreger at gmail.com>;
> > 发送时间: 2019年1月9日(星期三) 凌晨2:26
> > 收件人: "xmufive at qq.com"<sokoban at foxmail.com>;
> > 抄送: "openstack-discuss"<openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>;
> > 主题: Re: Ironic ibmc driver for Huawei server
> >
> > Greetings Qianbiao.NG,
> >
> > Welcome to Ironic!
> >
> > The purpose and requirement of Third Party CI is to test drivers are
> > in working order with the current state of the code in Ironic and help
> > prevent the community from accidentally breaking an in-tree vendor
> > driver. Vendors do this by providing one or more physical systems in a
> > pool of hardware that is managed by a Zuul v3 or Jenkins installation
> > which installs ironic (typically in a virtual machine), and configures
> > it to perform a deployment upon the physical bare metal node. Upon
> > failure or successful completion of the test, the results are posted
> > back to OpenStack Gerrit.
> >
> > Ultimately this helps provide the community and the vendor with a
> > level of assurance in what is released by the ironic community. The
> > cinder project has a similar policy and I'll email you directly with
> > the contacts at Huawei that work with the Cinder community, as they
> > would be familiar with many of the aspects of operating third party
> > CI.
> >
> > You can find additional information here on the requirement and the
> > reasoning behind it:
> >
> >
> https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/approved/third-party-ci.html
> >
> > We may also be able to put you in touch with some vendors that have
> > recently worked on implementing third-party CI. I'm presently
> > inquiring with others if that will be possible. If you are able to
> > join Internet Relay Chat, our IRC channel (#openstack-ironic) has
> > several individual who have experience setting up and maintaining
> > third-party CI for ironic.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Julia
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:54 AM xmufive at qq.com <sokoban at foxmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi julia,
> > >
> > > According to the comment of story<
> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004635 >,
> > > 1. The spec for huawei ibmc drvier has been post here:
> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004635 , waiting for review.
> > > 2. About the third-party CI part, we provide mocked unittests for our
> driver's code. Not sure what third-party CI works for in this case. What
> else we should do?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Qianbiao.NG
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190125/60f59252/attachment-0001.html>