Open Stack

Please confirm whether "auth_strategy" is set as ''keystone" in
configure file. I remember that the value of  "auth_strategy" is set as
"noauth" in "/usr/share/octavia/octavia-dist.conf"  default if you install
octavia by rpm. If the value was set as "noauth", you must manually specify
"project_id" for octavia.

Jeff Yang <yjf1970231893 at gmail.com> 于2019年1月2日周三 下午12:26写道：

> Please confirm whether "auth_strategy" is set as ''keystone" in
> configure file. I remember that the value of  "auth_strategy" is set as
> "noauth" in "/usr/share/octavia/octavia-dist.conf"  default if you install
> octavia by rpm. If the value was set as "noauth", you must manually specify
> "project_id" for octavia.
>
> Zane Bitter <zbitter at redhat.com> 于2019年1月2日周三 上午11:23写道：
>
>> On 2/01/19 1:34 AM, Adam Harwell wrote:
>> > I'm just on my phone over the holidays, but it kinda looks like the
>> code
>> > for this was just updated 12 days ago:
>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619577/
>> >
>> > If you're using that new code, I imagine it's possible there could be a
>> > bug that wasn't yet caught... If you're NOT using that code, maybe try
>> > it and see if it helps? I'm guessing it's related one way or another.
>> If
>> > you come to the #openstack-lbaas channel once more people are around
>> > (later this week?), we can probably take a look.
>>
>> That's only the example template (previously it was an example for
>> LBaaSv2; now it's an example for Octavia); there's been no recent change
>> to the code.
>>
>> >       --Adam Harwell (rm_work)
>> >
>> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018, 03:37 Zufar Dhiyaulhaq <zufardhiyaulhaq at gmail.com
>> > <mailto:zufardhiyaulhaq at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     I have try creating load balancer with Heat. but always get this
>> error :
>> >
>> >     Resource CREATE failed: OctaviaClientException:
>> >     resources.loadbalancer: Validation failure: Missing project ID in
>> >     request where one is required. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID:
>> >     req-b45208e1-a200-47f9-8aad-b130c4c12272)
>> >
>> >     OctaviaClientException: resources.loadbalancer: Validation failure:
>> >     Missing project ID in request where one is required. (HTTP 400)
>> >     (Request-ID: req-b45208e1-a200-47f9-8aad-b130c4c12272)
>>
>> What version of OpenStack are you using?
>>
>> The issue is that Heat is sending a "tenant_id" but Octavia wants a
>> "project_id", which is the new name for the same thing. (I think you
>> likely modified that template after trying it but before uploading it,
>> because there is no "project_id" property in Heat's
>> OS::Octavia::LoadBalancer resource type.)
>>
>> This bug has been reported and there is a patch up for review in Heat:
>> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004650
>>
>> There was a change to Octavia in Pike
>> (https://review.openstack.org/455442) to add backwards compatibility,
>> but it was either incomplete or the problem reoccurred and was fixed
>> again in Rocky (https://review.openstack.org/569881). My guess is that
>> it's likely broken in Pike and Queens.
>>
>> I'd certainly have expected Heat's gate tests to pick up the problem,
>> and it's a bit of a mystery why they didn't. Perhaps we're not
>> exercising the case where a project_id is required (using it at all is
>> an admin-only feature, so that's not too surprising I guess; it's
>> actually more surprising that there's a case where it's _required_).
>>
>> cheers,
>> Zane.
>>
>> >     I create 2 openstack environment :
>> >
>> >       * Heat with Octavia (Octavia Heat Template :
>> >         http://paste.opensuse.org/view//33592182 )
>> >       * Heat with Neutron Lbaasv2 (Neutron LBaaSv2 Heat Template :
>> >         http://paste.opensuse.org/view//71741503)
>> >
>> >     But always error when creating with octavia :
>> >
>> >       * Octavia Log (https://imgur.com/a/EsuWvla)
>> >       * LBaaS v2 (https://imgur.com/a/BqNGRPH)
>> >
>> >     Are Heat code is broken to create Octavia Load Balancer?
>> >
>> >     Best Regards,
>> >     Zufar Dhiyaulhaq
>> >
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190102/87739389/attachment.html>