Open Stack

Hello team,

We finally finished the initial version of the vision reflection document.
Please check it out [1]. Note that this is a live document and will be
updated frequently as we move forward.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

I would like to say thank Christ Dent and Julia Kreger for their initiative
at the Placement and Ironic team. I learn a lot from you guys when making
this document.

[1]
https://docs.openstack.org/searchlight/latest/contributor/vision-reflection.html
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/630216/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/629060/

Yours,

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 3:55 PM Trinh Nguyen <dangtrinhnt at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi team,
>
> Follow by the call of the TC [1] for each project to self-evaluate against
> the OpenStack Cloud Vision [2], the Searchlight team would like to produce
> a short bullet point style document comparing itself with the vision. The
> purpose is to find the gaps between Searchlight and the TC vision and it is
> a good practice to align our work with the rest. I created a new pad [3]
> and welcome all of your opinions. Then, after about 3 weeks, I will submit
> a patch set to add the vision reflection document to our doc source.
>
> [1]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-January/001417.html
> [2] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/technical-vision.html
> [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/-tc-vision-self-eval
>
> Ping me on the channel #openstack-searchlight
>
> Bests,
>
> --
> *Trinh Nguyen*
> *www.edlab.xyz <https://www.edlab.xyz>*
>
>

-- 
*Trinh Nguyen*
*www.edlab.xyz <https://www.edlab.xyz>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190221/7858e74e/attachment.html>