Open Stack

On 2/18/19 3:38 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>
> On 2/18/19 3:19 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019, at 6:11 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/15/19 11:23 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
>>>> ## Milestone Outlook
>>>>
>>>> https://releases.openstack.org/stein/schedule.html
>>>>
>>>> Feature freeze as well as final client release are both in 3 weeks.
>>>> Non-client release deadline is in two weeks, which means changes
>>>> needed for keystonemiddleware, keystoneauth, and the oslo libraries
>>>> need to be proposed and reviewed ASAP.
>>>
>>> Reading this, it occurred to me that we probably shouldn't be applying
>>> Oslo feature freeze to co-owned libraries. Most of those function more
>>> as non-client libraries than the oslo.* libs, so there's no need to
>>> freeze early.
>>>
>>> I've proposed https://review.openstack.org/637588 to reflect that in
>>> the
>>> Oslo policy. If you have an opinion on it please vote!
>>>
>>> -Ben
>>>
>> Thanks for mentioning that, I didn't even notice that Oslo had an
>> earlier freeze date. Arguably oslo.policy should be held to the same
>> standard as the other Oslo libraries since it has such far reach.
>> Oslo.limit not so much yet.
>
> Oh, hmm. I forgot we had oslo.* libraries that were co-owned too. I
> agree those should probably be kept to the Oslo feature freeze date.
> I'll update the policy change to reflect that, and maybe make a note
> that the policy is a guideline, not a hard and fast rule. If it makes
> sense to freeze a library earlier then we should do that regardless of
> what the policy says. I'm just trying to avoid stepping on other
> teams' toes unnecessarily.
>
> Note that oslo.limit falls under the "not released yet" exception
> (unfortunately) so feature freeze doesn't apply to it at all.

++

This will apply once we get a 1.0 release, I think? We could release
oslo.limit after feature freeze and still make changes to it up until we
release a 1.0... then we're are the point of no return (dun dun dun!).

>
>>
>> Colleen
>>
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190218/ab48e65d/attachment-0001.sig>