Subject: Re: [Trove] State of the Trove service tenant deployment model
Thierry Carrez
thierry at openstack.org
Mon Feb 11 15:50:57 UTC 2019
Lingxian Kong wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 7:04 AM Darek Król <dkrol3 at gmail.com
> <mailto:dkrol3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello Lingxian,
>
> I’ve heard about a few tries of running Trove in production.
> Unfortunately, I didn’t have opportunity to get details about
> networking. At Samsung, we introducing Trove into our products for
> on-premise cloud platforms. However, I cannot share too many details
> about it, besides it is oriented towards performance and security is
> not a concern. Hence, the networking is very basic without any
> layers of abstractions if possible.
>
> Could you share more details about your topology and goals you want
> to achieve in Trove ? Maybe Trove team could help you in this ?
> Unfortunately, I’m not a network expert so I would need to get more
> details to understand your use case better.
>
>
> Yeah, I think trove team could definitely help. I've been working on a
> patch[1] to support different sgs for different type of neutron ports,
> the patch is for the use case that `CONF.default_neutron_networks` is
> configured as trove management network.
>
> Besides, I also have some patches[2][3] for trove need to be reviewed,
> not sure who are the right people I should ask for review now, but would
> appriciate if you could help.
I think OVH has been deploying Trove as well, or at least considering
it... Ccing Jean-Daniel in case he can bring some insights on that.
--
Thierry
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list