Subject: Re: [Trove] State of the Trove service tenant deployment model

Thierry Carrez thierry at openstack.org
Mon Feb 11 15:50:57 UTC 2019


Lingxian Kong wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 7:04 AM Darek Król <dkrol3 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:dkrol3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hello Lingxian,
> 
>     I’ve heard about a few tries of running Trove in production.
>     Unfortunately, I didn’t have opportunity to get details about
>     networking. At Samsung, we introducing Trove into our products for
>     on-premise cloud platforms. However, I cannot share too many details
>     about it, besides it is oriented towards performance and security is
>     not a concern. Hence, the networking is very basic without any
>     layers of abstractions if possible.
> 
>     Could you share more details about your topology and goals you want
>     to achieve in Trove ? Maybe Trove team could help you in this ?
>     Unfortunately, I’m not a network expert so I would need to get more
>     details to understand your use case better.
> 
> 
> Yeah, I think trove team could definitely help. I've been working on a 
> patch[1] to support different sgs for different type of neutron ports, 
> the patch is for the use case that `CONF.default_neutron_networks` is 
> configured as trove management network.
> 
> Besides, I also have some patches[2][3] for trove need to be reviewed, 
> not sure who are the right people I should ask for review now, but would 
> appriciate if you could help.

I think OVH has been deploying Trove as well, or at least considering 
it... Ccing Jean-Daniel in case he can bring some insights on that.

-- 
Thierry



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list