Open Stack

+1, it would surely be nice to get to know some final stance on this.

-yoctozepto

czw., 28 lis 2019 o 06:49 Mohammed Naser <mnaser at vexxhost.com> napisał(a):
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:50 AM Witek Bedyk <witold.bedyk at suse.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/21/19 9:53 PM, Nate Johnston wrote:
> >
> > > I know several very large sites (ingesting billions of records per day)
> > > that run community InfluxDB and they get HA by putting influx-proxy [1]
> > > in front of it.  I've evaluated it for large scale uses before as well,
> > > and with influx-proxy I found no need for the clustering option.
> >
> > Similar architecture is followed by Monasca. InfluxDB instances can be
> > assigned to different Kafka consumer groups and consume messages
> > independently from the message queue. In case one of the instances is
> > down all the measurements are still buffered and get persisted as soon
> > as the instance is available again.
>
> I'm curious on what the final decision of the Ceilometer team regarding
> this discussion?
>
> > Best greetings
> > Witek
> >
>