Open Stack

On 8/21/19 6:15 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In the previous thread about the U release name, we discussed how the
> actual process for selecting the name has diverged from the written
> process.  I think it's important that we follow our own processes, so we
> should reconcile those.  We should change our actions or change the
> process.
> 
> Based on the previous discussion, I've proposed 6 changes to
> openstack/governance for some initial feedback.  We can, of course,
> tweak these options, eliminate them, or add new ones.
> 
> Ultimately, we're aiming for the TC to formally vote on one or a small
> number of changes similar to these.
> 
> I'd like for anyone interested in this to review these options and leave
> feedback on the changes themselves, or here on the mailing list.  Either
> is fine, and all will be considered.  Leaving "code-review" votes on the
> changes themselves will help us gauge relative support for the different
> options.
> 
> In a week, I'll collect the feedback and propose a next step.
> 
> https://review.opendev.org/675788 - Stop naming releases
> https://review.opendev.org/677745 - Name releases after major cities
> https://review.opendev.org/677746 - Name releases after the ICAO alphabet
> https://review.opendev.org/677747 - Ask the Foundation to name releases
> https://review.opendev.org/677748 - Name releases after random words
> https://review.opendev.org/677749 - Clarify the existing release naming process
> 
> The last one is worth particular mention -- it keeps the current process
> with some minor clarifications.
> 
> -Jim

Hi,

I'm quite happy to see that, so far, the "don't change anything in the
naming process" option seems popular.

Thomas