Open Stack

Chris,

Sorry for the slow reply here.

The team has talked about this a little bit in our team meetings.  We 
had previously talked to the placement team about how it could benefit 
Cinder and I think we had reach the conclusion that there wasn't really 
any benefit that Cinder could get from placement.

I think, however, the open item is if Placement can benefit from Cinder 
if we were to make available volume and storage backend information to 
Placement.  If so we would need to understand the work involved.

It might be worth planning some cross project time at the PTG just to 
sync up on where things are at.  Let me know if you are interested in 
doing this.

Thanks!

Jay


On 4/8/2019 11:16 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
>
> From the etherpad [1]
>
> * blazar
> * cinder
> * cyborg
> * ironic
> * neutron
>
> Who else?
>
> This is a bit of a catch-many topic. Despite being birthed in Nova,
> Placement is designed to be useful to lots of different services.
>
> There's already some time defined at the PTG to talk about the
> interaction of Ironic, Blazar, and Placement.
>
> What are the issues with that?
>
> What are the issues other services are experiencing with Placement?
> Preventing people from using Placement?
>
> What services are using Placement and the team doesn't know about
> it?
>
>
> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-ptg-train
>