Open Stack

I know ironic has a lot of issues with IPv6, not all of them are even under our 
control. I quite doubt we can make it, although I know there is downstream 
interest to make it happen.

On 4/17/19 10:15 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Sending a quick follow-up here. We now have a proposal for ipv6 testing support 
> as a community goal [0]. Thanks to gmann for writing it up!
> 
> I encourage folks to have a look if you have time before the PTG.
> 
> [0] https://review.openstack.org/653545
> 
> On 4/3/19 11:59 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since the community goal selection process has taken a turn, we wanted to 
>> send  an update regarding the current goals. We originally wanted to have the 
>> goals for Train be merged by this point to give project teams ample time to 
>> plan for them accordingly in their PTG scheduled. Due to discussions raised in 
>> each [0][1], it doesn't sound like either will be making it into Train as a 
>> feasible community goal. Fortunately, a couple of last minute goals might be a 
>> perfect fit for Train, instead of having a release without any community goals.
>>
>> The first one suggested is to render documentation as PDFs [2]. The second 
>> goal, which still needs to be proposed, is for IPv6 support. The advantage is 
>> that both of these goals are much smaller in scope, but still useful. We're 
>> running up against the clock on getting goals selected for Train, but we still 
>> have an opportunity to come to agreement on the new proposalsbefore the PTG.
>>
>> We'd like to ask TC and members of the community to review the proposed goals 
>> at their earliest convenience. Additionally, if someone wants help write up 
>> the IPv6 support goal [3][4], please reach out gmann and mnaser. Even though 
>> we were originally trying to make sure we had firm goals well before the PTG, 
>> the reduced scope of the new goals should make them easier to talk about in 
>> impromptu sessions or the hallway track.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> JP & Lance
>>
>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639376/
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639010/
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/647712/
>> [3]http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2019-03-28.log.html#t2019-03-28T15:10:36
>> [4] Note that this goal is for testing IPv6 networking setups in all projects. 
>> We already have a tempest full ipv6 job, it would be a matter of making these 
>> jobs passing and voting in the future.
>