Open Stack

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Kanevsky, Arkady 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:20 AM
To: openstack at nemebean.com; e0ne at e0ne.info; openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: Does anyone care about reviewstats?


[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 

We do need a single tool for all projects.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:02 AM
To: Ivan Kolodyazhny; OpenStack Discuss
Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?


[EXTERNAL EMAIL] 



On 4/17/19 10:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.
> 
> Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?

Not that I know of. Russell used to run it on his site, but I think he changed it to redirect to stackalytics a while back. I publish my output to http://nemebean.com/reviewstats/ but it only includes the projects I am core on.

> 
> Regards,
> Ivan Kolodyazhny,
> http://blog.e0ne.info/
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com 
> <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I do use it
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com
>     <mailto:openstack at nemebean.com>>
>     Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM
>     To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
>     Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
> 
> 
>     [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> 
> 
> 
>     On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>      >> There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core
>     team is
>      >> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I
>      >> had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now
>     owned
>      >> by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
>      >>
>      >> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we
>      >> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that
>      >> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the
>      >> attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people
>      >> are already doing).
>      >
>      > I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project
>     list
>      > from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats
>      > which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it
>      > works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats
>      > these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost
>     two
>      > years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process
>      > everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
>      >
>      > So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people
>      > issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists
>      > in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I
>      > doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate
>     anyway.
> 
>     The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to
>     gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
> 
>     It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists,
>     although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are
>     between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
> 
>      >
>      >>
>      >> [1]
>      >>
>     https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+
>      >> status:open
>      >>
>      >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members
>      >> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
>      >>
>      >
>