Open Stack

Www. Stackayltics.com publish all types of stats:) 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne at e0ne.info> wrote:
> 
> I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.
> 
> Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?
> 
> Regards,
> Ivan Kolodyazhny,
> http://blog.e0ne.info/
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:
>> I do use it
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM
>> To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
>> 
>> 
>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL] 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is 
>> >> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I 
>> >> had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned 
>> >> by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
>> >>
>> >> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we 
>> >> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that 
>> >> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the 
>> >> attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people 
>> >> are already doing).
>> > 
>> > I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list 
>> > from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats 
>> > which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it 
>> > works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats 
>> > these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two 
>> > years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process 
>> > everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
>> > 
>> > So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people 
>> > issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists 
>> > in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I 
>> > doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
>> 
>> The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to
>> gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
>> 
>> It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
>> 
>> > 
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+
>> >> status:open
>> >>
>> >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members
>> >> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
>> >>
>> > 
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190417/06fcf47f/attachment-0001.html>