Open Stack

Tony Breeds wrote:
> [...]
> This is slightly misleading, from the conversations I was present for
> the nova core team didn't want the powervm driver merged into the nova
> repo until it was ready.  At no point, that I recall, was keeping the
> nova-powervm code in it's own repo (as today) but under the governance
> of the nova PTL.
> 
> That isn't the proposal.  Migration to a SIG would basically mean:
> 
> a. Moving PowerVMStackers from [1] to [2]
> b. PowerVMSTackers SIG chair (*cough* PTL *cough*) would have to write a
>     small update for the annual report
> 
> There are a couple of things you miss out on (by default):
> 
> 1. (ATM) contributions to SIG repos aren't part of the electorate for TC
>     This wouldn't be hard to fix, and is already being discussed.
> 2. SIGs don't by default get space at PTGs or 'project update' type
>     sessions at the forum.  To the best of my knowledge this hasn't been
>     used to date.

Actually SIGs get proposed space at PTGs, exactly like project teams do.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)