[zun][k8s][tc] OpenStack Zun become the official provider for Virtual Kubelet
Hongbin Lu
hongbin034 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 6 19:30:32 UTC 2019
Thanks for pointing that out. I have submitted a PR for that:
https://github.com/virtual-kubelet/virtual-kubelet/pull/570
Best regards,
Hongbin
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:04 PM Chris Hoge <chris at openstack.org> wrote:
> Can we have Zun added to the official list of providers?
>
>
> https://github.com/virtual-kubelet/virtual-kubelet/blob/master/website/data/providers.yaml
>
> This will display Zun amongst the other providers on the Virtual Kubelet
> home page.
>
> https://virtual-kubelet.io/
>
> Congratulations and great work!
>
> On Mar 29, 2019, at 5:17 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin034 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:25 PM Mohammed Naser <mnaser at vexxhost.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:09 PM Hongbin Lu <hongbin034 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have a good news to share. Right now, Zun is officially accepted [1]
>> as OpenStack provider for Virtual Kubelet.
>> >
>> > A brief introduce. Virtual Kubelet is a CNCF sandbox project that
>> allows cloud providers to implement Kubelet equivalent functionality.
>> Existing providers of Virtual Kubelet are AWS Fargate, Azure Container
>> Instance, etc.
>> >
>> > I think it is quite important for OpenStack to have a provider
>> implementation in Virtual Kubelet, which basically makes OpenStack align
>> with what other proprietary cloud providers in this territory.
>>
>> I agree with this, congrats on the work!
>>
>> look forward to see this deployed somewhere on our clouds, I think
>> getting Kata integrated with Zun (or something like firecracker) is
>> key for the success of this in a multi tenant environment
>>
>
> Agree.
>
> Actually, we have people who were using Zun with Kata in before. Based on
> what they reported [1], they were able to get Kata working with Zun.
>
> Technically speaking, Zun is runtime agnostic, so any container runtime
> (i.e. Kata, runc) should work properly with Zun as long as it can be
> properly integrated with Docker Engine. If anyone tries Kata with Zun and
> finds something wrong, please feel free to report a bug:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zun .
>
> I would definitely encourage Zun team to work closely with Kata team to
> improve the integration between them.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/48#issuecomment-379364439
>
>
>>
>> > OpenStack Zun team is committed to enhance and maintain this provider
>> and offer a great k8s integration experience for our users.
>> >
>> > Please feel free to reach out the Zun team if there is any inquiries.
>> >
>> > [1] https://github.com/virtual-kubelet/virtual-kubelet/pull/239
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Hongbin
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mohammed Naser — vexxhost
>> -----------------------------------------------------
>> D. 514-316-8872
>> D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200
>> E. mnaser at vexxhost.com
>> W. http://vexxhost.com
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190406/3546228e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list