[requirements][FFE][congress] remove psycopg2>=2.7

Matthew Thode mthode at mthode.org
Thu Apr 4 17:17:34 UTC 2019


On 19-04-04 10:11:04, Eric K wrote:
> On 4/4/19, 7:22 AM, "Clark Boylan" <cboylan at sapwetik.org> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Apr 4, 2019, at 7:50 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> >> On 19-04-04 08:32:56, Alex Schultz wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 7:58 AM Matthew Thode <mthode at mthode.org>
> >>wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > On 19-04-04 01:20:18, Eric K wrote:
> >> > > > Requesting exception to remove a requirement to resolve a
> >>packaging issue.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The package is needed only for an experimental feature, but causes
> >> > > > packaging issue on RHEL/CentOS 7. Propose to remove from
> >>requirements and
> >> > > > require manual install to enable the experimental feature.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/649772/
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I imagine psycopg2 is one of many dependencies that are not fully
> >> > > compliant with our upper-constraints (and probably a bunch of
> >>projects
> >> > > global-constraints).  Is it possible to lower the version required
> >>(be
> >> > > compatible with 2.6 or whatever is in centos)?  The requirements
> >>project
> >> > > itself sets no lower bound for psycopg2.
> >> > >
> >> > 
> >> > Centos7 has 2.5. I had asked about getting 2.7 in RDO but if it's
> >> > optional it would be nice for it not to be included by default. We hit
> >> > the issue in puppet-congress so we disabled out actual test jobs[0]
> >> > because congress currently doesn't work on ubuntu[1] and was broken on
> >> > centos[2] by this new requirement.
> >> > 
> >> > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/649439/
> >> > [1] 
> >>http://logs.openstack.org/33/647333/1/check/puppet-openstack-beaker-ubunt
> >>u-bionic/2cfe5a4/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-04-02_10_48_17_614150
> >> > [2] 
> >>http://logs.openstack.org/33/647333/1/check/puppet-openstack-beaker-cento
> >>s-7/c10fb99/logs/syslog.txt.gz#_Apr_02_10_47_47
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> extra_requires may work for you (makes postgres support optional)
> >> 
> >>https://setuptools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/setuptools.html#declaring-ext
> >>ras-optional-features-with-their-own-dependencies
> >> 
> >> not sur eif pbr supports it though.
> >
> >PBR should support it. Here is an example from swiftclient installing
> >keystoneclient as an extra [3].
> >
> >[3] 
> >https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-swiftclient/tree/setup.cfg
> >#n36
> >
> Thank you all!
> 
> 
> Unfortunately the code relies on the psycopg2.sql module for query
> composition, which is only available on 2.7 and up. I'm also working on a
> future patch to remove the use of the psycopg2.sql module and also lower
> the psycopg2 version required, but I'm thinking considering the stein
> deadline a straightforward removal of psycopg2 can make sense.
> 
> I have fixed the unit test failure I overlooked and everything should be
> passing now [4]
> 
> And thank you for the extra_requires suggestion. It would probably take me
> a little while and a few tries to get it right. Again considering the
> deadline I'd rather just go with the current patch [4] if it's acceptable.
> Since the feature that requires psycopg2 is experimental I think requiring
> manual install of psycopg2 is ok.
> 
> Alternatively, if it seems better to delay Congress final RC or wait to
> fix this issue in X.0.1 we can do that too.
> 
> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/649772/
> 

The problem is that you are still requiring postgres support via some
code path, so that means that it's required, either statically or via
extra requires.  I don't think removing it is an appropriate solution.

-- 
Matthew Thode
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190404/d38ffed8/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list