Open Stack

Thanks!

Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 2 Apr 2019, 16:46 +0700, Stephen Finucane <sfinucan at redhat.com>, wrote:
> I've fixed this and released a 0.10.0 [1]. I'll work through updating
> global-requirements now. I would encourage moving away from both this
> extension and WSME in general as both have very little activity on them
> and I don't imagine that will change going forward. Chris Dent (CC'd)
> _might_ have some thoughts on how to approach this, but that's just a
> guess.
>
> Stephen
>
> [1] https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme/0.10.0/
>
> On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 14:09 +0700, Renat Akhmerov wrote:
> > Ok, thanks. Good to know :)
> >
> >
> > Renat
> > On 2 Apr 2019, 14:00 +0700, Eric Fried <openstack at fried.cc>, wrote:
> > > Stephen has been going around fixing these. See for example https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648670/
> > >
> > > I'm not sure about the maintainers/releases issue though.
> > >
> > > efried
> > >
> > > On Apr 2, 2019, at 01:13, Renat Akhmerov <renat.akhmerov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We have a problem with "openstack-tox-docs” CI job, see [1]. It
> > > > seems like the new version of Sphinx (2.0.0) is not compatible
> > > > with sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme 0.9.0.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know how to better address this? I guess there needs
> > > > to be a new version of sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme that fixes this
> > > > bug but I’m not even sure that this project is maintained.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://logs.openstack.org/16/648316/6/check/openstack-tox-docs/3a2d588/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-04-02_04_58_28_249658
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Renat Akhmerov
> > > > @Nokia
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190402/6fe6d65c/attachment-0001.html>