[trove] Trove for Train

Lingxian Kong anlin.kong at gmail.com
Mon Apr 1 22:26:18 UTC 2019


On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:17 AM Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com> wrote:

>
> Doesn't that make it _more_ important for the database nodes to not have
> access to the control plane rabbitmq? If a VM gets compromised I'd much
> rather that it not have access to a core piece of my infrastructure.
>

Yes, it does. That's why I said in the following that the communication
model of Trove could be changed by making the guest agent only repond
rather than sending request.

---
Cheers,
Lingxian Kong
Catalyst Cloud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190402/03623e4d/attachment.html>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list