On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 09:46:51AM +0000, Lee Yarwood wrote: > Agreed, I'm in favor of doing this and asking the oslo.service team to > rework the original fix on stable/rocky into something that doesn't > break Nova CI. Depending on how that looks maybe? I'm really not a fan of doing development on stable branches :( But I guess if the impact really is limited to CI it's probably okay. <snip> > I'm being slightly dense this morning, I can't seem to find a reference > to this lower-constraints.txt policy anywhere in the stable docs: > > https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html Nope your density is the same as always ;P It isn't covered in the stable docs (but should be) The closest we have written is: https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/dependency-management.html#stable-branch-maintenance and even then it's only a passing comment about raising effective minimums. Those docs are outdated WRT the new lower-constraints.txt and extended maintenance work. <snip> Yours Tony. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20181123/23b8eb28/attachment.sig>