Open Stack

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:54:01PM -0500, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:03 PM Harry Rybacki <hrybacki at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:57 PM Morgan Fainberg
> > <morgan.fainberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ideally I would like to see it in the form of least specific to most
> > specific. But more importantly in a way that there is no additional
> > delimiters between the service type and the resource. Finally, I do not
> > like the change of plurality depending on action type.
> > >
> > > I propose we consider
> > >
> > > <service-type>:<resource>:<action>[:<subaction>]
> > >
> > > Example for keystone (note, action names below are strictly examples I
> > am fine with whatever form those actions take):
> > > identity:projects:create
> > > identity:projects:delete
> > > identity:projects:list
> > > identity:projects:get
> > >
> > > It keeps things simple and consistent when you're looking through
> > overrides / defaults.
> > > --Morgan
> > +1 -- I think the ordering if `resource` comes before
> > `action|subaction` will be more clean.
> >
> 

Great idea. This is looking better and better.