[openstack-dev] [nova] [ironic] agreement on how to specify options that impact scheduling and configuration
Jay Pipes
jaypipes at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 13:24:39 UTC 2018
Added [ironic] topic.
On 10/04/2018 06:06 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> While discussing the "Add HPET timer support for x86 guests"
> blueprint[1] one of the items that came up was how to represent what are
> essentially flags that impact both scheduling and configuration. Eric
> Fried posted a spec to start a discussion[2], and a number of nova
> developers met on a hangout to hash it out. This is the result.
>
> In this specific scenario the goal was to allow the user to specify that
> their image required a virtual HPET. For efficient scheduling we wanted
> this to map to a placement trait, and the virt driver also needed to
> enable the feature when booting the instance. (This can be generalized
> to other similar problems, including how to specify scheduling and
> configuration information for Ironic.)
>
> We discussed two primary approaches:
>
> The first approach was to specify an arbitrary "key=val" in flavor
> extra-specs or image properties, which nova would automatically
> translate into the appropriate placement trait before passing it to
> placement. Once scheduled to a compute node, the virt driver would look
> for "key=val" in the flavor/image to determine how to proceed.
>
> The second approach was to directly specify the placement trait in the
> flavor extra-specs or image properties. Once scheduled to a compute
> node, the virt driver would look for the placement trait in the
> flavor/image to determine how to proceed.
>
> Ultimately, the decision was made to go with the second approach. The
> result is that it is officially acceptable for virt drivers to key off
> placement traits specified in the image/flavor in order to turn on/off
> configuration options for the instance. If we do get down to the virt
> driver and the trait is set, and the driver for whatever reason
> determines it's not capable of flipping the switch, it should fail.
Ironicers, pay attention to the above! :) It's a green light from Nova
to use the traits list contained in the flavor extra specs and image
metadata when (pre-)configuring an instance.
> It should be noted that it only makes sense to use placement traits for
> things that affect scheduling. If it doesn't affect scheduling, then it
> can be stored in the flavor extra-specs or image properties separate
> from the placement traits. Also, this approach only makes sense for
> simple booleans. Anything requiring more complex configuration will
> likely need additional extra-spec and/or config and/or unicorn dust.
Ironicers, also pay close attention to the advice above. Things that are
not "scheduleable" -- in other words, things that don't filter the list
of hosts that a workload can land on -- should not go in traits.
Finally, here's the HPET os-traits patch. Reviews welcome (it's tiny patch):
https://review.openstack.org/608258
Best,
-jay
> Chris
>
> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-hpet-on-guest
> [2]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607989/1/specs/stein/approved/support-hpet-on-guest.rst
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list