Hi, On 05/15/2018 09:19 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: > Hello! > > As part of the work from the Security Squad, we added the ability for the > containerized undercloud to encrypt the overcloud plans. This is done by > enabling Swift's encrypted volumes, which require barbican. Right now it's > turned off, but I would like to enable it by default [1]. What do you folks think? I like the idea, but I'm a bit skeptical about adding a new service to already quite bloated undercloud. Why is barbican a hard requirement here? > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567200/ > > BR > > -- > Juan Antonio Osorio R. > e-mail: jaosorior at gmail.com <mailto:jaosorior at gmail.com> > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >