Open Stack

Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> Who are your users, what do they need, are you meeting those needs, and what can you do to better things?
>
> IMO, OpenStack really needs some Leadership at a higher level. It seems to be lacking some things:
> 1. A group that performs... lacking a good word.... reconnaissance? How is OpenStack fairing in the world. How is the world changing and how must OpenStack change to continue to be relevant. If you don't know you have a problem you can't correct it.
> 2. A group that decides some difficult political things, like who the users are. Maybe at a per constellation level. This does not mean rejecting use cases from "non users". just helping the projects sort out priorities.
> 3. A group that decides on a general direction for OpenStack's technical solutions, encourages building up the commons, helps break down the project communication walls and picks homes for features when it takes too long for a user need to be met (users really don't care what OpenStack project does what feature. They just that they are suffering, things don't get addressed in a timely manner, and will maybe consider looking outside of OpenStack for a solution)
This is a big reason we're excited that the Ops & Users Meetup are 
co-locating at the next PTG.  Some of the breakdown is getting 
actionable items from Ops Meetups and UC back to the devs in time for 
the next development cycle.
>
> The current governance structure is focused on hoping the individual projects will look at the big picture and adjust to it, and commit the relevant common code to the commons rather then one-offing a solution and discussing solutions between projects to gain consensus. But that's generally not happening. The projects have a narrow view of the world and just wanna make progress on their code. I get that. The other bits are hard. Guidance to the projects on how they are are, or are not fitting, would help them make better choices and better code.
Keep in mind, UC also has governance :)  I think it's really important 
to start looking to the UC to help craft the big picture and be part of 
the conversation. This serves the purpose of getting Ops & Devs working 
together towards a better OpenStack.  It also helps broaden the 
perspective of everyone involved in the project, from all sides.
>
> The focus so much on projects has made us loose sight of why they exist. To serve the Users. Users don't use projects as OpenStack has defined them though. And we can't even really define what a user is. This is a big problem.
>
> Anyway, more Leadership please! Ready..... GO! :)
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Jay Pipes [jaypipes at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 9:31 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Topics for the Board+TC+UC meeting in Vancouver
>
> On 05/11/2018 12:21 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>> On 11/05/18 11:46, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>> On 05/10/2018 08:12 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>>> On 10/05/18 16:45, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>>>> On 5/10/2018 3:38 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>>>>> How can we avoid (or get out of) the local maximum trap and ensure
>>>>>> that OpenStack will meet the needs of all the users we want to
>>>>>> serve, not just those whose needs are similar to those of the users
>>>>>> we already have?
>>>>> The phrase "jack of all trades, master of none" comes to mind here.
>>>> Stipulating the constraint that you can't please everybody, how do
>>>> you ensure that you're meeting the needs of the users who are most
>>>> important to the long-term sustainability of the project, and not
>>>> just the ones who were easiest to bootstrap?
>>> Who gets to decide who the users are "that are most important to the
>>> long-term sustainability of the project"?
>> The thing I'm hoping to convince people of here is that the question is
>> interesting independently of how you define that.
>
> Agreed. The question is interesting regardless, but how seriously people
> take the answers to the question will depend on how much they agree with
> the people that decide who the "important users" are.
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180511/a5c35854/attachment.html>