Open Stack

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode <prometheanfire at gentoo.org>
wrote:

> python-swiftclient prior to 3.2.0 seemed to incidentally support radosgw
> tempurls.  That is, there was no official support, but it still worked.
>
> In 3.2.0 (specifically the linked commit(s)) tempurls were validated to
> require /v1/account/container/object, which does not work with radosgw
> as it expects /v1/container/object.  This means that radosgw tempurls
> fail to work, which further means that radosgw will stop working for
> things like ironic.
>
> I can see the point that swiftclient should not care about ceph not
> fully implementing the swift spec and not supporting the radosgw url
> syntax, but it seems like a step back.  If this is not fixed then things
> like ironic will not work with radosgw for Ocata and above (as that's
> when this change was made).  We'd need to wait for either ceph to fix
> this and support the account part of the url (probably just dropping it)
> or have people fork python-swiftclient to 'fix' it.
>
> I'm not sure what the right answer is...
>

Sounds like in the meantime ironic should pin python-swiftclient, yes?

// jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180509/58b79835/attachment.html>