Open Stack

On 08/05/18 16:53, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-05-08 16:28:46 +0100:
>> On 08/05/18 16:09, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>> On 30/04/18 17:16, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>>>> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-04-25 16:54:46 -0400:
>>>>>> 1. Fix oslo.service functional tests -- the Oslo team needs help
>>>>>>     maintaining this library. Alternatively, we could move all
>>>>>>     services to use cotyledon (https://pypi.org/project/cotyledon/).
>>>
>>> I submitted a patch that fixes the py35 gate (which was broken due to
>>> changes between CPython 3.4 and 3.5), so once that merges we can flip
>>> the gate back to voting:
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/566714
>>>
>>>> For everyone's awareness, we discussed this in the Oslo meeting today
>>>> and our first step is to see how many, if any, services are actually
>>>> relying on the oslo.service functionality that doesn't work in Python
>>>> 3 today.  From there we will come up with a plan for how to move forward.
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1482633 is the original bug.
>>>
>>> These tests are currently skipped in both oslo_service and nova.
>>> (Equivalent tests were removed from Neutron and Manila on the principle
>>> that they're now oslo_service's responsibility.)
>>>
>>> This appears to be a series of long-standing bugs in eventlet:
>>>
>>> Python 3.5 failure mode:
>>> https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/308
>>> https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/189
>>>
>>> Python 3.4 failure mode:
>>> https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/476
>>> https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/145
>>>
>>> There are also more problems coming down the pipeline in Python 3.6:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/issues/371
>>>
>>> That one is resolved in eventlet 0.21, but we have that blocked by
>>> upper-constraints:
>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/upper-constraints.txt#n135
>>>
>>>
>>> Given that the code in question relates solely to standalone WSGI
>>> servers with SSL and everything should have already migrated to Apache,
>>> and that the upstream is clearly overworked and unlikely to merge fixes
>>> any time soon (plus we would have to deal with the fallout of moving the
>>> upper constraint), I agree that it would be preferable if we could just
>>> ditch this functionality.
>>
>> There are a few projects that have not migrated, and some that have
>> issues running in non standalone WSGI mode (due, ironically to eventlet)
>>
>> We should probably get people to run these projects behind an reverse
>> proxy, and terminate SSL there, but right now we don't have that
>> documented.
> 
> Do you know which projects?

I know of 2:

Designate - mainly due to the major lack of resources available during
the uwsgi goal period, and the level of work needed to unravel our
tooling to support it.

Glance - Has issues with image upload + uwsgi + eventlet [1]

I am sure there are probably others, but I know of these 2.

[1] https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/glance/unreleased.html#b1

> 
> Doug
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180508/4697560a/attachment.sig>