Open Stack

Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-05-01 21:51:19 +0200:
> On 05/01/2018 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to
> > document "constellations" of OpenStack components to make it easier
> > for deployers and users to understand which parts they need to have
> > the features they want [1].
> > 
> > John Garbutt has started writing the first such document [2], but
> > as we talked about the content we agreed the TC governance repository
> > is not the best home for it, so I have proposed creating a new
> > repository [3].
> > 
> > In order to set up the publishing jobs for that repo so the content
> > goes to docs.openstack.org, we need to settle the ownership of the
> > repository.
> > 
> > I think it makes sense for the documentation team to "own" it, but
> > I also think it makes sense for it to have its own review team
> > because it's a bit different from the rest of the docs and we may
> > be able to recruit folks to help who might not want to commit to
> > being core reviewers for all of the documentation repositories. The
> > TC members would also like to be reviewers, to get things going.
> > 
> > So, is the documentation team willing to add the new "constellations"
> > repository under their umbrella? Or should we keep it as a TC-owned
> > repository for now?
> 
> I'm fine having it as parts of the docs team. The docs PTL should be 
> part of the review team for sure,
> 
> Andreas

Yeah, I wasn't really clear there: I intend to set up the documentation
and TC teams as members of the new team, so that all members of both
groups can be reviewers of the new repository.

Doug