Open Stack

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, at 7:59 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
> 
> i'm thinking about publishing the latest release of tap-as-a-service on pypi.
> background: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555788/
> iirc, the naming (tap-as-a-service vs neutron-taas) was one of concerns
> when we talked about this topic last time. (long time ago. my memory is dim.)
> do you have any ideas or suggestions?
> probably i'll just use "tap-as-a-service" unless anyone has strong opinions.
> because:
> - it's the name we use the most frequently
> - we are not neutron (yet?)

http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tap-as-a-service/tree/setup.cfg#n2 shows that tap-as-a-service is the existing package name so probably a good one to go with as anyone that already has it installed from source should have pip do the right thing when talking to pypi.

Clark