Open Stack

On 13 March 2018 at 18:51, Eric K <ekcs.openstack at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mistral folks and others,
>
> I'm working on Congress tempest tests [1] for integration with Mistral. In
> the tests, we use a Mistral service client to call Mistral APIs and
> compare results against those obtained by Mistral driver for Congress.
>
> Regarding the service client, Congress can either import directly from
> Mistral tempest plugin [2] or maintain its own copy within Congress
> tempest plugin. I'm not sure whether Mistral team expects the service
> client to be internal use only, so I hope to hear folks' thoughts on which
> approach is preferred. Thanks very much!
>

I don't have a strong opinion here. I am happy for you to use the Mistral
service client, but it will be hard to guarantee stability. It has been
stable (since it hasn't changed), but we have a temptest refactor planned
(once we move the final tempest tests from mistraclient to
mistral-tempest-plugin). So there is a fair chance we will break the API at
that point, however, I don't know when it will happen, as nobody is
currently working on it.

I have cc'ed Chandan - hopefully he can provide some input. He has advised
me and the Mistral team regarding tempest before.


>
> Eric
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538336/
> [2]
> https://github.com/openstack/mistral-tempest-plugin/blob/
> master/mistral_tem
> pest_tests/services/v2/mistral_client.py
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180316/8c1a5516/attachment.html>