Open Stack

On 23 February 2018 at 14:48, Derek Higgins <derekh at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins <derekh at redhat.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of the
>>>>> networking stuff is different?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we would need to run baremetal tests for this new featureset,
>>>> see existing files for examples.
>>>>
>>> Do you mean that we should use existing tests somewhere or create new
>>> ones?
>>>
>>
>> I mean we should use existing tempest tests from ironic, etc. Maybe just
>> a baremetal scenario that spawn a baremetal server and test ssh into it,
>> like we already have with other jobs.
>>
> Done, the current set of patches sets up a new non voting job
> "tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario011-multinode-oooq-container" which setup up
> ironic in the overcloud and run the ironic tempest job
> "ironic_tempest_plugin.tests.scenario.test_baremetal_basic_
> ops.BaremetalBasicOps.test_baremetal_server_ops"
>
> its currently passing so I'd appreciate a few eyes on it before it becomes
> out of date again
> there are 4 patches starting here https://review.openstack.
> org/#/c/509728/19
>

This is now working again so If anybody has the time I'd appreciate some
reviews while its still current
See scenario011 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509728/




>
>
>>
>> o Is running a script on the controller with NodeExtraConfigPost the best
>>>>> way to set this up or should I be doing something with quickstart? I don't
>>>>> think quickstart currently runs things on the controler does it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What kind of thing do you want to run exactly?
>>>>
>>> The contents to this file will give you an idea, somewhere I need to
>>> setup a node that ironic will control with ipmi
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485261/19/ci/common/vbmc_setup.yaml
>>>
>>
>> extraconfig works for me in that case, I guess. Since we don't productize
>> this code and it's for CI only, it can live here imho.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Emilien Macchi
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> ______________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180628/0ffd4461/attachment.html>