Open Stack

On Wed, Jun 20 2018, Bedyk, Witold wrote:

Same as Gordon. You should maintain that in your own repo.
There's just no bandwidth in Ceilometer right now for things like that.
:(

> Hello Telemetry Team,
>
> any opinion on this?
>
> Best greetings
> Witek
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bedyk, Witold <witold.bedyk at est.fujitsu.com>
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 10:28
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][monasca] Monasca
>> publisher for Ceilometer
>> 
>> Hello Telemetry Team,
>> 
>> We would like to contribute a Monasca publisher to Ceilometer project [1]
>> and add it to the list of currently supported transports [2].
>> The goal of the plugin is to send Ceilometer samples to Monasca API.
>> 
>> I understand Gordon's concerns about adding maintenance overhead for
>> Ceilometer team which he expressed in review but the code is pretty much
>> self-contained and does not affect Ceilometer core. It's not our intention to
>> shift the maintenance effort and Monasca team should still be responsible
>> for this code.
>> 
>> Adding this plugin will help in terms of interoperability of both projects and
>> can be useful for wider parts of the OpenStack community.
>> 
>> Please let me know your thoughts. I hope we can get this code merged.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Witek
>> 
>> 
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/562400
>> [2]
>> https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/contributor/architecture.html
>> #processing-the-data
>

-- 
Julien Danjou
/* Free Software hacker
   https://julien.danjou.info */
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180620/e9efc717/attachment.sig>