[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Migration to Storyboard
Alex Schultz
aschultz at redhat.com
Fri Jun 15 13:55:15 UTC 2018
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Michele Baldessari <michele at acksyn.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 01:58:26PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> During the Storyboard session today:
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/continuing-the-migration-lp-sb
>>
>> We mentioned that TripleO would continue to migrate during Rocky cycle.
>> Like Alex mentioned in this thread, we need to migrate the scripts used by
>> the CI squad so they work with SB.
>> Once this is done, we'll proceed to the full migration of all blueprints
>> and bugs into tripleo-common project in SB.
>> Projects like tripleo-validations, tripleo-ui (more?) who have 1:1 mapping
>> between their "name" and project repository could use a dedicated project
>> in SB, although we need to keep things simple for our users so they know
>> where to file a bug without confusion.
>> We hope to proceed during Rocky but it'll probably take some time to update
>> our scripts and documentation, also educate our community to use the tool,
>> so we expect the Stein cycle the first cycle where we actually consume SB.
>>
>> I really wanted to thank the SB team for their patience and help, TripleO
>> is big and this migration hasn't been easy but we'll make it :-)
>
> Having used storyboard for the first time today to file a bug^Wstory in heat,
> I'd like to raise a couple of concerns on this migration. And by all
> means, if I just missed to RTFM, feel free to point me in the right
> direction.
>
> 1. Searching for bugs in a specific project is *extremely* cumbersome
> and I am not even sure I got it right (first you need to put
> openstack/project in the search bar, wait and click it. Then you add
> the term you are looking for. I have genuinely no idea if I get all
> the issues I was looking for or not as it is not obvious on what
> fields this search is performed
> 2. Advanced search is either very well hidden or not existant yet?
> E.g. how do you search for bugs filed by someone or over a certain
> release, or just generally more complex searches which are super
> useful in order to avoid filing duplicate bugs.
>
> I think Zane's additional list also matches my experience very well:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-June/131365.html
>
> So my take is that a migration atm is a bit premature and I would
> postpone it at least to Stein.
>
Given that my original request was to try and do it prior to M2 and
that's past, I think I'd also side with waiting until early Stein to
continue. Let's focus on the Rocky work and push this to early Stein
instead. I'll talk about this in the next IRC meeting if anyone wishes
to discuss further.
Thanks,
-Alex
> Thanks,
> Michele
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Bumping this up so folks can review this. It was mentioned in this
>> > week's meeting that it would be a good idea for folks to take a look
>> > at Storyboard to get familiar with it. The upstream docs have been
>> > updated[0] to point to the differences when dealing with proposed
>> > patches. Please take some time to review this and raise any
>> > concerns/issues now.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -Alex
>> >
>> > [0] https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#
>> > development-workflow
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Alex Schultz <aschultz at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > Hello tripleo folks,
>> > >
>> > > So we've been experimenting with migrating some squads over to
>> > > storyboard[0] but this seems to be causing more issues than perhaps
>> > > it's worth. Since the upstream community would like to standardize on
>> > > Storyboard at some point, I would propose that we do a cut over of all
>> > > the tripleo bugs/blueprints from Launchpad to Storyboard.
>> > >
>> > > In the irc meeting this week[1], I asked that the tripleo-ci team make
>> > > sure the existing scripts that we use to monitor bugs for CI support
>> > > Storyboard. I would consider this a prerequisite for the migration.
>> > > I am thinking it would be beneficial to get this done before or as
>> > > close to M2.
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts, concerns, etc?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > [0] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/76
>> > > [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2018/
>> > tripleo.2018-05-08-14.00.log.html#l-42
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Emilien Macchi
>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> --
> Michele Baldessari <michele at acksyn.org>
> C2A5 9DA3 9961 4FFB E01B D0BC DDD4 DCCB 7515 5C6D
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list