[openstack-dev] [vitrage] update_timestamp precision

Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava) ifat.afek at nokia.com
Mon Jun 11 09:12:38 UTC 2018


Hi Eric,

Apparently we have inconsistent behavior between the different datasources. The format of the timestamp should be '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ' as defined in [1]. We need to go over the code and make sure all datasources are aligned. I created a bug for it [2].

[1] https://github.com/openstack/vitrage/blob/master/vitrage/datasources/transformer_base.py
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/vitrage/+bug/1776181
Best regards,
Ifat

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Eric K <ekcs.openstack at gmail.com<mailto:ekcs.openstack at gmail.com>>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 at 00:20
Subject: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] update_timestamp precision
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>


Hi I'm building integration with Vitrage webhook and looking for some
clarification on the timestamp precision to expect.

In the sample webhook payload found in doc the resource and the alarm
shows different time stamp precisions:
https://docs.openstack.org/vitrage/latest/contributor/notifier-webhook-plug
in.html


Thank you!



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180611/c4209605/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list