Open Stack

Given that the ironic-lib version in question is already in
upper-constraints, I think it may be fine. Realistically we do want
people to be running the latest version of ironic-lib when deploying
anyway. That being said, I'm +1 for this, however we need a second
ironic-core to be willing to review this over the next few days.

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Michael Turek
<mjturek at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I would like to request a FFE for this RFE
> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/1749057
>
> The implementation should be complete and is currently passing CI, but does
> need more reviews. I'd also like to test this locally ideally.
>
> pros
> ---
> - Improves ppc64le support
>
> cons
> ---
> - Bumps ironic-lib version for both IPA and Ironic
>
> risk
> ---
> - There are other deployment methods for ppc64le, including wholedisk and
> netboot. However, this feature is desired to improve parity between x86 and
> ppc64le for tripleo. The feature should not affect any current working
> deployment methods, but please review closely.
>
> Please let me know if you'd like more detail on this or have any questions!
> Thanks!
>
> -Mike  Turek
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev