Open Stack

Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:05:26PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>
>> Hello folks,
>>      So really the subject says it all.  I fell like at the time we
>> created the Stable branch project team that was the only option.  Since
>> then we have crated the SIG structure and in my opinion that's a better
>> fit.  We've also transition from 'Stable Branch Maintenance' to
>> 'Extended Maintenance'
>>
>> Being a SIG will make it explicit that we *need* operator, user and
>> developer contributions.
> 
> I meant to say I've created:
> https://review.openstack.org/584205 and
> https://review.openstack.org/584206
> 
> To make this transition.

I think it makes a lot of sense. Stable branch maintenance was always a 
bit of an odd duck in the project teams (owning no repository), and is 
technically a downstream activity (post-release) with lots of potential 
to get users involved.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)