[openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

Colleen Murphy colleen at gazlene.net
Wed Jan 31 18:11:19 UTC 2018

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Graham Hayes <gr at ham.ie> wrote:
> On 31/01/18 17:22, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>> On 01/31/2018 06:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>> On 1/30/2018 9:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
>>> These all seem like good topics for big cross-project issues.
>>> I've never liked the "BM/VM" platform naming thing, it seems to imply
>>> that the only things one needs to care about for these discussions is
>>> if they work on or use nova and ironic, and that's generally not the
>>> case.
>> ++ can we please rename it? I think people (myself included) will expect
>> specifically something related to bare metal instances co-existing with
>> virtual ones (e.g. scheduling or networking concerns). Which is also a
>> great topic, but it does not seem to be present on the list.
> Yeah - both of these topic apply to all projects. If we could do
> scheduled time for both of these, and then separate time for Ironic /
> Nova issues it would be good.
>>> So if you do have a session about this really cross-project
>>> platform-specific stuff, can we at least not call it "BM/VM"? Plus,
>>> "BM" always makes me think of something I'd rather not see in a room
>>> with other people.


Sorry, I didn't mean to be exclusive. These topics do apply to most
projects, and it did feel awkward writing that email with keystone
goals in mind when keystone is in neither category.


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list