[openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

Lance Bragstad lbragstad at gmail.com
Wed Jan 31 16:52:19 UTC 2018

On 01/30/2018 09:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for
> cross-project discussions related to baremetal and VM management. We
> don't currently have that on the schedule for this PTG. There is still
> some free time available that we can ask for[1]. Should we try to
> schedule some time for this?
> From a keystone perspective, some things we'd like to talk about with
> the BM/VM teams are:
> - Unified limits[2]: we now have a basic REST API for registering
> limits in keystone. Next steps are building out libraries that can
> consume this API and calculate quota usage and limit allocation, and
> developing models for quotas in project hierarchies. Input from other
> projects is essential here.
> - RBAC: we've introduced "system scope"[3] to fix the admin-ness
> problem, and we'd like to guide other projects through the migration.
> - Application credentials[4]: this main part of this work is largely
> done, next steps are implementing better access control for it, which
> is largely just a keystone team problem but we could also use this
> time for feedback on the implementation so far
So, I'm probably biased, but a huge +1 for me. I think the last
baremetal/vm session in Denver was really productive and led to most of
what we accomplished this release. Who else do we need to get involved
in order to get this scheduled? Do we need some more projects to show up
(e.g. cinder, nova, neutron)?

Tacking on the RBAC stuff, it would be cool to sit down with others and
talk about basic roles [0], since we have everything to make that
possible. I suppose we could start collecting topics in an etherpad and
elaborating on them there.

[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523973/
> There's likely some non-keystone-related things that might be at home
> in a dedicated BM/VM room too. Do we want to have a dedicated day or
> two for these projects? Or perhaps not dedicated days, but
> planned-in-advance meeting time? Or should we wait and schedule it
> ad-hoc if we feel like we need it?
> Colleen
> [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRmqAAQZA1rIzlNJpVp-X60-z6jMn_95BKWtf0csGT9LkDharY-mppI25KjiuRasmK413MxXcoSU7ki/pubhtml?gid=1374855307&single=true
> [2] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/queens/limits-api.html
> [3] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/queens/system-scope.html
> [4] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/queens/application-credentials.html
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180131/4d31fe78/attachment.sig>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list