[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-05

Graham Hayes gr at ham.ie
Tue Jan 30 19:00:54 UTC 2018


On 30/01/18 18:34, Chris Dent wrote:
> 
> Linkified: https://anticdent.org/tc-report-18-05.html
> 
> Your author has been rather ill, so this week's TC Report will be a
> bit abridged and mostly links. I'll try to return with more robust
> commentary next week.
> 
> ## RDO Test Days
> 
> dmsimard showed up in `#openstack-tc` channel to [provide some
> details](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-24.log.html#t2018-01-24T16:32:11)
> 
> on forthcoming RDO Test Days.
> 
> ## More on the Goals
> 
> [Conversations](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-25.log.html#t2018-01-25T15:48:50)
> 
> [continue](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-30.log.html#t2018-01-30T09:03:31)
> 
> about choosing OpenStack goals. One issue raised is whether we have
> sufficient insight into how people are really using and deploying
> OpenStack to be able to prioritize goals.
> 
> ## Project Inception
> 
> smcginnis [pointed
> out](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-29.log.html#t2018-01-29T17:25:25)
> 
> a governance discussion in the CNCF about [project
> inception](https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/85) that he thought
> might be of interest to the TC. Discussion ensued around how the
> OpenStack ecosystem differs from the CNCF and as a result the need, or
> lack thereof, for help to bootstrap projects is different.
> 
> ## PTG Scheduling
> 
> The PTG is coming and with it
> [discussion](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-30.log.html#t2018-01-30T09:22:44)
> 
> of how best to make room for all the conversations that need to
> happen, including things that come up at the last minute. New this
> time will be a more formal structuring of [post-lunch
> presentations](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-30.log.html#t2018-01-30T09:38:17)
> 
> to do theme-setting and information sharing.
> 
> ## Board Meeting at the PTG
> 
> Monday there was
> [discussion](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-29.log.html#t2018-01-29T16:06:18)
> 
> about the OpenStack Foundation [Board
> Meeting](https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/26Feb2018BoardMeeting)
> 
> overlapping with the first day of the PTG. This follows [discussion in
> email](http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2018-January/002558.html).

There was also a suggestion [2] that the community / TC put an item on
the F2F meeting agenda, with an associated etherpad [2]:

1-
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-01-29.log.html#t2018-01-29T16:34:43
2 - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tc-message-to-board-dublin-2018

> 
> ## Today's Board Meeting
> 
> I attended [today's Board
> Meeting](https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/30Jan2018BoardMeeting)
> 
> but it seems that according to the [transparency
> policy](http://www.openstack.org/legal/transparency-policy/) I can't
> comment:
> 
>>  No commenting on Board meeting contents and decisions until
>>  Executive Director publishes a meeting summary
> 
> That doesn't sound like transparency to me, but I assume there must be
> reasons.
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180130/1c2f0fa4/attachment.sig>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list