+1 (and thx Dmitry and Julia for reviewing!) --ruby On 2018-01-23, 5:15 AM, "Dmitry Tantsur" <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote: I'm +1 on this, because the feature has been proposed for a while (has changed the contributor group at least once) and is needed for feature parity with virtual machines in nova. On 01/23/2018 06:56 AM, Shivanand Tendulker wrote: > Hi > > The rescue feature [1] is an high priority for ironic in Queens. The spec for > the same was merged in Newton. This feature is necessary for users that lose > regular access to their machine (e.g. lost passwords). > > Landing node rescue feature late in the cycle will lead to less time being > available for testing, with a risk that the feature being released with defects. > The code changes are fairly isolated from existing code to ensure it does not > cause any regression. The Ironic side rescue code patches are all in review [2], > and are now are getting positive reviews or minor negative feedback. > > dtantsur and TheJulia have kindly agreed to review the same during the FFE window. > > [1] > https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/ironic-specs/specs/not-implemented/implement-rescue-mode.html > [2] > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1526449+(status:open+AND+project:openstack/ironic) > > Thanks and Regards, > Shiv (stendulker) > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev