+1 I would really hate to not have a place to reference people to, but the documentation now provides such place. Keeping the examples up-to-date is quite annoying, I'm all for dropping them. On 01/22/2018 01:45 PM, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > While I was looking at the traits work, I noticed we still have policy and > config in tree for ironic and ironic inspector: > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/policy.json.sample > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/ironic.conf.sample > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/policy.json > > And in a similar way: > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector/tree/policy.yaml.sample > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector/tree/example.conf > > There is an argument that says we shouldn't force operators to build a full > environment to generate these, but this has been somewhat superseded by us > having good docs: > > https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/configuration/sample-config.html > https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/configuration/sample-policy.html > https://docs.openstack.org/ironic-inspector/latest/configuration/sample-config.html > https://docs.openstack.org/ironic-inspector/latest/configuration/sample-policy.html > > It could look something like this (but with the tests working...): > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536349 > > What do you all think? > > Thanks, > johnthetubaguy > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >