Open Stack

Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> writes:

> Nice work Sofer!
> I have a few questions, see inline.
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot <sathlang at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So join us (upgrade squad) to celebrate the working ocata->pike upgrade
>> job[1], without any depends-on whatsoever.
>
> w00t, really good work!
>
>> We would like it to be voting as soon as possible. It has been a
>> rather consuming task to revive that forgotten but important jobs, and
>> the only way for it to not drift into oblivion again is to have it
>> voting.
>
> The last time I asked how we could make RDO jobs voting, it was
> something in Software Factory to enable, but I'm not sure about the
> details.
> I'm ok to make them voting, as long as:
>
> - they don't timeout or reach the timeout limit (which isn't the case
> now, 2h27 is really good)
> - they proved to be stable during some time
> - they're part of the promotion pipeline so gate can't break easily
>
> BTW the process is documented here:
> https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-specs/blob/master/specs/policy/adding-ci-jobs.rst

Oki reading that, thanks for the pointer.

>> Eventually, let’s thanks rdo-cloud people for their support (especially
>> David Manchado), James Slagle for Traas[2] and Alfredo Moralejo for his
>> constant availability to answer our questions.
>
> ++
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532791/, look for «gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode-upgrades-pike»
>> [2] https://github.com/slagle/traas … the repo we use -> https://github.com/sathlan/traas (so many pull requests to make that it would be cool for it to be an openstack project … :))
>
> Please rebase https://github.com/slagle/traas/pull/9 and address
> James's comments, so we can avoid using a fork.

So yeah, the situation with traas is not so good as we have a 70 patches
difference with the main repo.  The pull/9 may be abandoned (jfrancoa
will see if it’s still required) in favor of the what’s in
https://github.com/sathlan/traas .  We’re going to work toward pulling
in slage/traas the main patches to avoid a fork.

> Also, any plan to run tempest instead of pingtest?

Not yet.  We could cycle back to that at a later point in time, unless
it’s a requirement.  Currently I’ve added it to our backlog.

A last point is that we may add ceph in the mix based on what it’s done
in scenario 001 and 004.

>
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Emilien Macchi
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- 
Chem