[openstack-dev] [oslo] UUID sentinel needs a home

Jay Pipes jaypipes at gmail.com
Thu Aug 23 03:24:06 UTC 2018


On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 10:13 AM Eric Fried <openstack at fried.cc> wrote:

> For some time, nova has been using uuidsentinel [1] which conveniently
> allows you to get a random UUID in a single LOC with a readable name
> that's the same every time you reference it within that process (but not
> across processes). Example usage: [2].
>
> We would like other projects (notably the soon-to-be-split-out placement
> project) to be able to use uuidsentinel without duplicating the code. So
> we would like to stuff it in an oslo lib.
>
> The question is whether it should live in oslotest [3] or in
> oslo_utils.uuidutils [4]. The proposed patches are (almost) the same.
> The issues we've thought of so far:
>
> - If this thing is used only for test, oslotest makes sense. We haven't
> thought of a non-test use, but somebody surely will.
> - Conversely, if we put it in oslo_utils, we're kinda saying we support
> it for non-test too. (This is why the oslo_utils version does some extra
> work for thread safety and collision avoidance.)
> - In oslotest, awkwardness is necessary to avoid circular importing:
> uuidsentinel uses oslo_utils.uuidutils, which requires oslotest. In
> oslo_utils.uuidutils, everything is right there.
>

My preference is to put it in oslotest. Why does oslo_utils.uuidutils
import oslotest? That makes zero sense to me...

-jay

- It's a... UUID util. If I didn't know anything and I was looking for a
> UUID util like uuidsentinel, I would look in a module called uuidutils
> first.
>
> We hereby solicit your opinions, either by further discussion here or as
> votes on the respective patches.
>
> Thanks,
> efried
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/17b69575bc240ca1dd8b7a681de846d90f3b642c/nova/tests/uuidsentinel.py
> [2]
>
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/17b69575bc240ca1dd8b7a681de846d90f3b642c/nova/tests/functional/api/openstack/placement/db/test_resource_provider.py#L109-L115
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/594068
> [4] https://review.openstack.org/594179
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180822/4dc12f60/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list