Open Stack

On 8/17/2018 12:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
> I know politics will be involved in this, but this is a really terrible
> reason to do a thing, IMHO. After the most recent meeting we had with
> the Cinder people on placement adoption, I'm about as convinced as ever
> that Cinder won't (and won't need to)_consume_  placement any time
> soon. I hope it will_report_  to placement so Nova can make better
> decisions, just like Neutron does now, but I think that's the extent
> we're likely to see if we're honest.

[1] is a concrete example of where cinder would benefit from using 
placement to avoid scheduling conflicts, which was one of the primary 
reasons it was developed for nova as well.

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559718/

-- 

Thanks,

Matt