Open Stack

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:59:47AM -0500, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2018, at 10:51 AM, Chris Dent <cdent+os at anticdent.org> wrote:
> > 
> > One of the questions that has come up on the etherpad is about how
> > placement should be positioned, as a project, after the extraction.
> > The options are:
> > 
> > * A repo within the compute project
> > * Its own project, either:
> >  * working towards being official and governed
> >  * official and governed from the start
> 
> I would like to hear from the Cinder and Neutron teams, especially those who were around when those compute sub-projects were split off into their own projects. Did you feel that being independent of compute helped or hindered you? And to those who are in those projects now, is there any sense that things would be better if you were still part of compute?
> 

I wasn't around at the beginning of the separation, but I don't think Cinder
would be anything like it is today (you can decide if that's a good thing or
not) if it had remained a component of Nova.

> My opinion has been that Placement should have been separate from the start. The longer we keep Placement inside of Nova, the more painful it will be to extract, and hence the likelihood of that every happening is greatly diminished.

I have to agree with this statement.

> 
> 
> -- Ed Leafe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev