[openstack-dev] [barbican][oslo][release] FFE request for castellan
Ade Lee
alee at redhat.com
Wed Aug 15 16:58:33 UTC 2018
Done.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592154/
Thanks,
Ade
On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 09:20 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
> On 08/14/2018 01:56 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> > > On 08/10/2018 10:15 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to request a feature freeze exception to get the
> > > > following
> > > > change in for castellan.
> > > >
> > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575800/
> > > >
> > > > This extends the functionality of the vault backend to provide
> > > > previously uninmplemented functionality, so it should not break
> > > > anyone.
> > > >
> > > > The castellan vault plugin is used behind barbican in the
> > > > barbican-
> > > > vault plugin. We'd like to get this change into Rocky so that
> > > > we can
> > > > release Barbican with complete functionality on this backend
> > > > (along
> > > > with a complete set of passing functional tests).
> > >
> > > This does seem fairly low risk since it's just implementing a
> > > function that
> > > previously raised a NotImplemented exception. However, with it
> > > being so
> > > late in the cycle I think we need the release team's input on
> > > whether this
> > > is possible. Most of the release FFE's I've seen have been for
> > > critical
> > > bugs, not actual new features. I've added that tag to this
> > > thread so
> > > hopefully they can weigh in.
> > >
> >
> > As far as releases go, this should be fine. If this doesn't affect
> > any other
> > projects and would just be a late merging feature, as long as the
> > castellan
> > team has considered the risk of adding code so late and is
> > comfortable with
> > that, this is OK.
> >
> > Castellan follows the cycle-with-intermediary release model, so the
> > final Rocky
> > release just needs to be done by next Thursday. I do see the
> > stable/rocky
> > branch has already been created for this repo, so it would need to
> > merge to
> > master first (technically stein), then get cherry-picked to
> > stable/rocky.
>
> Okay, sounds good. It's already merged to master so we're good
> there.
>
> Ade, can you get the backport proposed?
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> _____
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
> cribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list