Open Stack

sorry, I didn't see any solution for following error found in [1]
I just rechecked the patch and is this kind of issue already fixed?

ubuntu-xenial | Requirement for package eventlet : Requirement
(package=u'eventlet', location='',
specifiers='!=0.18.3,!=0.20.1,<0.21.0,>=0.18.2', markers=u'', comment=u'#
MIT', extras=frozenset([])) does not match openstack/requirements value :
set([Requirement(package='eventlet', location='',
specifiers='!=0.18.3,!=0.20.1,>=0.18.2', markers='', comment='# MIT',
extras=frozenset([]))])

[1]
logs.openstack.org/87/523387/32/check/requirements-check/408e28c/job-output.txt.gz

Best Regards!

Kevin (Chen) Ji 纪 晨

Engineer, zVM Development, CSTL
Notes: Chen CH Ji/China/IBM at IBMCN   Internet: jichenjc at cn.ibm.com
Phone: +86-10-82451493
Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian District,
Beijing 100193, PRC



From:	Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
To:	openstack-dev <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date:	04/11/2018 08:56 PM
Subject:	Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet



Excerpts from IWAMOTO Toshihiro's message of 2018-04-11 18:19:02 +0900:
> On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:58:28 +0900,
> Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2018-04-09 13:39:30 +1000:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:41:07AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > >
> > > > My understanding of our use of upper constraints was that this
should
> > > > (almost) always be the case for (almost) all dependencies.  We
should
> > > > rely on constraints instead of requirements caps. Capping libs like
> > > > pbr or eventlet and any other that is in use globally is incredibly
> > > > difficult to work with when you want to uncap it because you have
to
> > > > coordinate globally. Instead if using constraints you just bump the
> > > > constraint and are done.
> > >
> > > Part of the reason that we have the caps it to prevent the tools that
> > > auto-generate the constraints syncs from considering these versions
and
> > > then depending on the requirements team to strip that from the bot
> > > change before committing (assuming it passes CI).
> > >
> > > Once the work Doug's doing is complete we could consider tweaking the
> > > tools to use a different mechanism, but that's only part of the
reason
> > > for the caps in g-r.
> > >
> > > Yours Tony.
> >
> > Now that projects don't have to match the global requirements list
> > entries exactly we should be able to remove caps from within the
> > projects and keep caps in the global list for cases like this where we
> > know we frequently encounter breaking changes in new releases. The
> > changes to support that were part of
> >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__review.openstack.org_-23_c_555402_&d=DwIGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=8sI5aZT88Uetyy_XsOddbPjIiLSGM-sFnua3lLy2Xr0&m=y9YWvP5nDDQCyw3QGNWGvQS-CVeHBeXA9rfHaLf3JpQ&s=P99Z7BlpiP8Sg9_5Ku4JMW_tJWXARpd2ldSvFFlFBpU&e=

>
> As eventlet has been uncapped in g-r, requirements-check is
> complaining on unrelated project-local requirement changes.
> I'm not quite sure but doesn't seem to be a intended behavior.
>
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__logs.openstack.org_57_451257_16_check_requirements-2Dcheck_c32ee69_job-2Doutput.txt.gz&d=DwIGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=8sI5aZT88Uetyy_XsOddbPjIiLSGM-sFnua3lLy2Xr0&m=y9YWvP5nDDQCyw3QGNWGvQS-CVeHBeXA9rfHaLf3JpQ&s=6uHgERcFttsqFakjBTrjvKZhk5n-tZO-e0QMd7zj0nc&e=

>

This error is related to the change in
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__review.openstack.org_-23_c_560050_&d=DwIGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=8sI5aZT88Uetyy_XsOddbPjIiLSGM-sFnua3lLy2Xr0&m=y9YWvP5nDDQCyw3QGNWGvQS-CVeHBeXA9rfHaLf3JpQ&s=1hIA6J9OfM1mhcTDq89NkGmoAQi_fDfhel7q5dgcwIA&e=
 which applies the matching
rules to all requirements settings any time any requirements-related
file is touched. The change was made because we are less in-sync than we
thought and because we're allowing "bad" settings to stay in place.

To correct the problem in the log you linked to, remove the cap from
eventlet in neutron.

Doug

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_openstack-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=8sI5aZT88Uetyy_XsOddbPjIiLSGM-sFnua3lLy2Xr0&m=y9YWvP5nDDQCyw3QGNWGvQS-CVeHBeXA9rfHaLf3JpQ&s=nEWykx9Cfm6deVwO9Sdge-_Q31mCbdfAmvp_KoPaenc&e=




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180411/b4a7be23/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180411/b4a7be23/attachment.gif>