[openstack-dev] [ALL][PTLs] [Community goal] Toggle the debug option at runtime

Sławek Kapłoński slawek at kaplonski.pl
Fri Apr 6 10:37:10 UTC 2018


Hi,

Thanks Akihiro for help. I added „neutron-dynamic-routing” task to this story and I will push patch for it soon.
There is still so many things that I need to learn about OpenStack and Neutron :)

—
Best regards
Slawek Kaplonski
slawek at kaplonski.pl




> Wiadomość napisana przez Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> w dniu 06.04.2018, o godz. 11:34:
> 
> 
> Hi Slawek,
> 
> 2018-04-06 17:38 GMT+09:00 Sławek Kapłoński <slawek at kaplonski.pl>:
> Hi,
> 
> One more question about implementation of this goal. Should we take care (and add to story board [1]) projects like:
> 
> In my understanding, tasks in the storyboard story are prepared per project team listed in the governance.
> IMHO, repositories which belong to a project team should be handled as a single task.
> 
> The situations vary across repositories.
> 
> 
> openstack/neutron-lbaas
> 
> This should be covered by octavia team.
> 
> openstack/networking-cisco
> openstack/networking-dpm
> openstack/networking-infoblox
> openstack/networking-l2gw
> openstack/networking-lagopus
> 
> The above repos are not official repos.
> Maintainers of each repo can follow the community goal, but there is no need to be tracked as the neutron team.
> 
> openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing
> 
> This repo is part of the neutron team. We, the neutron team need to cover this.
> 
> FYI: The official repositories covered by the neutron team is available here.
> https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/projects/neutron.html
> 
> Thanks,
> Akihiro
> 
> 
> Which looks that should be probably also changed in some way. Or maybe list of affected projects in [1] is „closed” and if some project is not there it shouldn’t be changed to accomplish this community goal?
> 
> [1] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2001545
> 
>> Best regards
> Slawek Kaplonski
> slawek at kaplonski.pl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Wiadomość napisana przez ChangBo Guo <glongwave at gmail.com> w dniu 26.03.2018, o godz. 14:15:
> >
> >
> > 2018-03-22 16:12 GMT+08:00 Sławomir Kapłoński <slawek at kaplonski.pl>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I took care of implementation of [1] in Neutron and I have couple questions to about this goal.
> >
> > 1. Should we only change "restart_method" to mutate as is described in [2] ? I did already something like that in [3] - is it what is expected?
> >
> >      Yes , let's the only  thing.  we need test if that if it works .
> >
> > 2. How I can check if this change is fine and config option are mutable exactly? For now when I change any config option for any of neutron agents and send SIGHUP to it it is in fact "restarted" and config is reloaded even with this old restart method.
> >
> >     good question, we indeed thought this question when we proposal  the goal.  But It seems difficult to test  that consuming projects like Neutron automatically.
> >
> > 3. Should we add any automatic tests for such change also? Any examples of such tests in other projects maybe?
> >      There is no example for tests now, we only have some unit tests  in oslo.service .
> >
> > [1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/rocky/enable-mutable-configuration.html
> > [2] https://docs.openstack.org/oslo.config/latest/reference/mutable.html
> > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554259/
> >
> > —
> > Best regards
> > Slawek Kaplonski
> > slawek at kaplonski.pl
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ChangBo Guo(gcb)
> > Community Director @EasyStack
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20180406/4a481205/attachment.sig>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list